Alaska
Contact: Matt Murphy
matt.murphy@alaska.gov
907-269-0876
-We have a Short Term Traffic Count operation that uses hose counts, loop counts and some Miovision camera counts for turning movements. We contract some of the short term counts out and we do some ourselves. We don’t do very much for pedestrian or non-motorized counts but we typically use the Miovision cameras for pedestrian counts. We also have a Continuous Count operation using peizos and loops and radar sensors. We conduct on-going quality control of the data and make site visits to each of our CCS stations on a constant on-going process all year long
-We use GPS but not imbedded in the count files. We keep the GPS information on field sheets and in our data base
-Installation of all sensors is contracted out. We do the maintenance after installation is complete and for the lifespan of those sensors. We do calibration with the contractor immediately after the installation of new sensors and we have on going quality control that we do internally.
-I’d be willing to share all kinds of info about our traffic count management system. Please feel free to ask.
California
Contact: Cindy Probyl
cindy.pribyl@dot.ca.gov
- Currently, we use employees to do manual counts from our short-term location videos using 13 classification of vehicle types as well as bicycles. We also do manual verification counts on the permanent ATRs/Continuous Counters via video approx. once every three years – with occasional on-site manual counts at these permanent stations. Does your department use similar methods, or do you rely completely on automated counts? Caltrans Traffic Census Program collects traffic counts manually with hoses, loops and piezos (truck counts 15 bin classifications) manually with traffic counters mostly Peek ADR 1000s, Sabres, ADR 2000s and ADR 3000s for automated communication stations using IP Address, WIFI and Modems. Also we have some Diamond counters, Phoenix Series, Traffic Tally II and Unicorns used with hose/tubes, loops and piezos (truck counts). We do not use video for all data collection and we do not collect pedestrian or bike counts. Our traffic counts are done on a three year rotation cycle, we have 12 districts throughout the State of California which Caltrans divides the count collection cycle by district, county and routes. We collect continuous counts 365 days per year full time count station, quarterly counts, profile counts, ramp counts, truck counts on three year count cycle. Are your counts done in-house or out-sourced? Or with a combination? Caltrans counts are done in-house.
- Much of our hardware is aging to the point that the vendors are no longer supporting the platforms. We are aware of the recent RAC survey on Short-Term Traffic Counts and the 2013 survey on Traffic Count Data Software. We would appreciate knowing specifically what equipment your agency uses, and how satisfied you are with the results. We recognize that much of that was covered in the 2013 study, but want to see how the technology has changed in the interim. I am not aware of RAC survey on Short-Term Traffic Counts and the 2013 survey on Traffic Count Data Software. Our state has aging hardware which we are upgrading over time with mostly Diamond and Peek vendor. Does anyone use GPS readings in the count files to ensure counts are in the right location? If so, how? Caltrans District Traffic Census staff are using their cell phones and other instruments for ensuring GPS readings at the count site location.
- Is the installation, maintenance and calibration of the field equipment done in-house, or through a contractor? At this time, Caltrans Traffic Census staff install, maintenance and calibrate the field equipment.
- Is there any other information regarding your traffic count management system that you would be willing to share? The California Department of Transportation is currently in the process of developing a new database system to replace our current existing old Oracle platform database system due to newer technology, FHWA requirements, etc.
Idaho
Contact: Margaret Pridmore
Margaret.Pridmore@itd.idaho.gov
208-334-8221
I was given your name as a contact for this information. Oregon DOT is interested in finding out the methods neighboring state DOTs use for traffic data collection in short- and long-term traffic counting locations. We are in the process of migrating to a cloud-based software, and are examining our current hardware, technology and methodology.
- Currently, we use employees to do manual counts from our short-term location videos using 13 classification of vehicle type as well as bicycles. We also do manual verification counts on the permanent ATRs/Continuous Counters via video approx. once every three years – with occasional on-site manual counts at these permanent stations. Does your department use similar methods, or do you rely completely on automated counts? Are your counts done in-house or out-sourced? Or with a combination? Short-term counts: We have 3 staff that perform 48 hour counts using either pneumatic tubes or Miovision cameras. We typically only perform manual counts when we are validating our nearly 300 ATR/WIM sites each year (and we try to hit each annually).
- Much of our hardware is aging to the point that the vendors are no longer supporting the platforms. We are aware of the recent RAC survey on Short-Term Traffic Counts and the 2013 survey on Traffic Count Data Software. We would appreciate knowing specifically what equipment your agency uses, and how satisfied you are with the results. We recognize that much of that was covered in the 2013 study, but want to see how the technology has changed in the interim. Do you use GPS readings in the count files to ensure counts are in the right location? If so, how? Right now we have quite a few Diamond portable counters. However, we are also looking at replacing some that are significantly old and having issues. I am about to put in a request to purchase 40 mini-TRS units from IRD. We don’t currently use the GPS to ensure that the counter is in the correct location. Whether we decide to use the GPS in the counter or to adapt our internal processes to use GPS from other devices, we do intend to use GPS as a location validation tool in the future.
- Is the installation, maintenance and calibration of the field equipment done in-house, or through a contractor? We don’t currently do much with contractors. However, we are looking to expand our partnerships with local agencies to begin a coordinated collection and reporting effort. We post all of our continuous count info the ArcGIS, as well as our AADT layer. In the near future we are hoping to post our short-term 24+ hours counts to ArcGIS as well.
- Is there any other information regarding your traffic count management system that you would be willing to share? If I can answer any other questions, please don’t hesitate to give me a call or send me an email.
Florida
Contact: Joey Gordon
850-414-4005
Joey.Gordon@dot.state.fl.us
Florida DOT has approximately 18,000 + short-term counters which are deployed statewide by our 8 geographic districts, covering the entire program using a 3-year cycle, counting about 1/3 per year. These are primarily combinations of road-tube counters and what we refer to as PTMS’s, which are permanently installed loops & sensors with a cabinet on the shoulder to deploy short-term counters. These short-term counts are managed by the districts and the data is uploaded to our DB2 database (TCI) through Survey Processing Software (SPS), developed by Northrop Grumman. All of the districts except District 2 use contracts with vendors for the data collection, District 2 uses FDOT staff. A variety of equipment is used and the districts are required to submit a count schedule and proof of certification of each unit to me no later than January 31st of each year prior to beginning their data collection for that year.
For our continuous counters, the Central Office in Tallahassee oversees the installation, maintenance and operation of 300 + sites, of which 40 + are Weigh-in-Motion (WIM). This is done jointly by FDOT staff and our contractors, Southern Traffic Service and Marlin Engineering. All sites are polling nightly, starting at approximately 12:15 am, and the data is loaded locally to our Oracle tables. We have separate tables for volume, classification, speed and WIM data. We currently use equipment from PEEK, Diamond, IRD and QFREE. The entire system is called Traffic Polling & Analysis System (TPAS), which does the polling, convert/load, Quality Control, End-of-Year Processing, and reporting of data to the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA). This system was also developed by Northrop Grumman. These sites are inspected and certified annually by our consultant.
We have initiated a contract with MS2 of Ann Arbor, Michigan to privide a software solution called Traffic Data Management System (TDMS) to replace TPAS. It is an Amazon cloud-based system and will be public-facing rather than behind the FDOT firewall. We are mid-stream and using TPAS while we are developing TDMS and should be switching over in Spring of 2020. MS2 has 20 + states that are using their system and several local entities as well.
Maine
Contact: Deborah Morgan
Deborah.Morgan@maine.gov
207-624-3606
- Currently, we use employees to do manual counts from our short-term location videos using 13 classification of vehicle types as well as bicycles. We also do manual verification counts on the permanent ATRs/Continuous Counters via video approx. once every three years – with occasional on-site manual counts at these permanent stations. Does your department use similar methods, or do you rely completely on automated counts? Are your counts done in-house or out-sourced? Or with a combination? We perform manual verification counts at our CCS sites (volume and classification). For those on the Interstate System we may collect 24 video and manually count from the video. We try to do each site on a three-year cycle. This work is done in-house.
- Much of our hardware is aging to the point that the vendors are no longer supporting the platforms. We are aware of the recent RAC survey on Short-Term Traffic Counts and the 2013 survey on Traffic Count Data Software. We would appreciate knowing specifically what equipment your agency uses, and how satisfied you are with the results. We recognize that much of that was covered in the 2013 study, but want to see how the technology has changed in the interim. Does anyone use GPS readings in the count files to ensure counts are in the right location? If so, how? Our short duration tube counters are old. We use IRD’s Mini TRS for volume counts and Peek’s ADR-1000 for classification counts. Most of this equipment was purchased in the late 1990’s and early in 2000. The Peek recorders are no longer supported. We had planned to release an RFP for new equipment last year, but data management software became a priority. We have been collecting GPS data for the past 6 years with handheld Garmin units to verify locations and assist with accurately placing counts on our network. One of our employees looks up each location through Goggle Earth. We did purchase Jamar’s Black Cat II in 2017 for counting the Interstate system as road tube counters became too dangerous to set. However, this is length-based classification and our Planning Division needs the 13 category counts. We will begin looking into a way to convert the 4 length categories to 13. We still collect the FHWA 13 for all other roads.
- Is the installation, maintenance and calibration of the field equipment done in-house, or through a contractor? Our CCS sites are equipped with TDCs EMU3 counters. We installed them in 2017/2018. Although there were a lot of issues to work through, everything is going well now. These counters employ the latest technology and their functionality far exceeds our older equipment. Most of the vendors that have been around for a long time are still using the same technology that was in use 20 years ago. For sites on the Interstate system we’re replacing all volume counters with Wavetronix radar units. They require little to no maintenance and are not affected by the never-ending road work. We have manually verified their accuracy.
- Is the installation, maintenance and calibration of the field equipment done in-house, or through a contractor? Until this year most of the installations were done in-house. However, since our primary Technician was injured, we will be contracting out this work. We maintain all of our classification and volume sites. The WIM program contracts all of their installation and maintenance. The calibration is done in-house in the spring and fall.
Montana
Contact: Becky Duke
bduke@mt.gov
406-444-6122
- Currently, we use employees to do manual counts from our short-term location videos using 13 classification of vehicle types as well as bicycles. MDT does manual counts from short-term videos only when needed for project design purposes. This section only monitors vehicle activities but all videos are available to MDT staff for additional data mining such as bike and pedestrian activity.
- We also do manual verification counts on the permanent ATRs/Continuous Counters via video approx. once every three years – with occasional on-site manual counts at these permanent stations. MDT’s practice has been to conduct 4-hour verification count against each Continuous Count Stations (CCS) each quarter. We use Jamar boards which we feel work well. Our work process is to download per vehicle data from our CCSs each day. This allows staff to monitor the sites more closely to identify drifts or changes in the data. Quarterly on-site manual counts are still conducted but, due to cuts in staff, these manual counts have been prioritized, i.e. top priority: Volume only CCS in order to collect 4 quarters of vehicle classification data, 2nd priority: length base sites, classification sites are verified at least once a year or as a data review indicates is necessary. Staff also perform an inspection of the site including roadway, pull box, counter, phone connection, etc. Pictures are taken and uploaded to Traffic Management system so staff can refer to the information as needed.
- Does your department use similar methods, or do you rely completely on automated counts? Are your counts done in-house or out-sourced? Or with a combination? MDT uses in house staff for all CCS related work, other than the initial installation of a WIM system. We hire seasonal staff to supplement our short-term count staff. In Montana, the MPOs (we have 3) have count programs. The counts are submitted to MDT’s web-based traffic management system and are QC’d and factored using the same procedures as MDT’s counts.
- Much of our hardware is aging to the point that the vendors are no longer supporting the platforms. We are aware of the recent RAC survey on Short-Term Traffic Counts and the 2013 survey on Traffic Count Data Software. We would appreciate knowing specifically what equipment your agency uses, and how satisfied you are with the results. MDT utilizes Diamond counters for portable and for volume and length-based CCStations. MDT uses ECM components in WIM sites. These general work well but we have experiences issues with components locking up.
- We recognize that much of that was covered in the 2013 study, but want to see how the technology has changed in the interim. Does anyone use GPS readings in the count files to ensure counts are in the right location? If so, how? Staff have iPads for navigational purposes. They use the iPads to collect GPS coordinates when placing a short-term counter. They also use the iPads to take pictures if needed. The iPads automatically sync with the map when the employee is in a service area. This allows pictures and other information to be uploaded and available for entire section to review.
- Is the installation, maintenance and calibration of the field equipment done in-house, or through a contractor? MDT uses in house staff for all CCS related work, other than the initial installation of a WIM system. This includes installation of non-WIM Diamond CCstations, maintenance and calibration of all CCS.
- Is there any other information regarding your traffic count management system that you would be willing to share? MDT is currently working with our traffic software vendor, MS2, to develop an Equipment Status Tracking System (ESTS) to consolidate our statewide inventory and cost information into a single location. Goals include ability to better capture and track program costs for budgeting purposes and to quantify impacts of program and staffing cuts. We’re also working with enforcement agencies to train officers and develop reporting tools so they can use utilize
Nevada
Matthew Hamilton
MHamilton@dot.nv.gov
- Currently, we use employees to do manual counts from our short-term location videos using 13 classification of vehicle type as well as bicycles. We also do manual verification counts on the permanent ATRs/Continuous Counters via video approx. once every three years – with occasional on-site manual counts at these permanent stations. Does your department use similar methods, or do you rely completely on automated counts? Are your counts done in-house or out-sourced? Or with a combination?
We also perform short term 13 bin classification counts, although we do not count bicycles. Nor do we have cameras. We are just breaking into that realm of data collection. We currently conduct 24-hour continuous around the clock manuals. We used to do 48-hour continuous manuals, but it became too taxing on our manpower.
We do manual verifications at all our permanent ATR/AVC/WIM sights every year, or whenever a counter is replaced.
All our data collection is done in-house.
- Much of our hardware is aging to the point that the vendors are no longer supporting the platforms. We are aware of the recent RAC survey on Short-Term Traffic Counts and the 2013 survey on Traffic Count Data Software. We would appreciate knowing specifically what equipment your agency uses, and how satisfied you are with the results. We recognize that much of that was covered in the 2013 study, but want to see how the technology has changed in the interim. Do you use GPS readings in the count files to ensure counts are in the right location? If so, how?
On the field side, for our short term data collection efforts, we use almost exclusively Diamond Traffic Products. We jumped ship for a period and switched over to traffic monitoring equipment from JAMAR Technologies. We later created a Product Evaluation Committee to test and verify the accuracy of data collection equipment prior to purchase and we settled on the Diamond Limited for short term volume counts and classification data (although we have and use a large fleet of Diamond Unicorn, Phoenix, and Pegasus recorders as well). Unfortunately, the Diamond Limited are not in production any longer, so we tested the Diamond Omega X3 classifier with positive results. We had some budget issues are were not able to purchase any, but I may still have the raw data that I can forward to you for analysis.